Monday, September 21, 2020

the reason people use this is that it's customizable.

if i wanted a generic form submission with no customizability, i'd just go back to shitty facebook.
i mean, you have tremendous control over how you present these pages.

it seems rather daft to force down a new tool bar without being able to modify it, to force autosave on people that don't want it, to make 1-click operations 3-click operations, to force users with slow machines or connections to have to load fancy fonts and icons they don't want, etc.

whoever came up with this should be fired - not because it exists, but because you can't undo it.
so, this post is to check to see if inserting

"<div style="text-align: left;"></div>"

into the template defaults to the "normal" header style, rather than the "paragraph" header style, thereby preventing the need to select it every time i create a new post in order to avoid the annoying double spacing.

and, indeed, it appears to work.

even if it rather sillily inserts that line at the beginning of every carriage break...

i still don't like this, but that was the biggest usability problem. i've sent a large number of complaints to google regarding customization [if you're going to change it, whatever, but why force it? why not allow me to tweak it? the new ui is ugly and cluttered, and i'd like a way to make it more orthogonal and less cartoonish. i'll get used to it, i guess, but i won't like it and i just don't understand why you'd want to force users to get used to things that they hate].

Sunday, September 20, 2020

yes, he's obviously joking.

i'd still like to see him try it, though.

it's a reflection on the state of democracy in america, that this is legitimately comical, rather than frightening.

for fuck's sakes.

how many of his idiot supporters will just believe him?

but, the point i'm making is that joe biden is exactly the same fucking thing as donald trump.

vote for biden - he's just like trump, but with 60% more senility!

(he clearly meant 200,000, not 200 million. but, if trump - or bush - made that error, you wouldn't write it off as an honest mistake. and, you should be judging this idiot by the same standards you judge the other idiots by.)

and, this is the garden path that the government has walked us down - people will expect another lockdown, another $2000/month check and a perpetual shutodwn.

because being able to hug your grandparents is the most important thing, and the whole world should be shutdown indefinitely so that you can.

if they had listened to the science from the start, rather than base their policy on what they saw in their twitter feeds, they wouldn't have created this kind of unrealistic set of expectations.

but, here we are - and this is what people expect at this point.

john turner is dead, huh?

guess he didn't have a choice, after all.

i always hated the randianism underlying that clip; it was right out of a fucking rush song. and, the fact that he sat there and took it like an idiot always pissed me off.

well, he's not making any more choices, now.
it's nice to see some more grounded analysis.

we'll need to wait until samhain before we can begin to make a serious analysis as to what was effective and what wasn't. and, we won't be able to seriously draw conclusions until saturnalia, at the earliest.


likewise, it's too early to jump to this conclusion, even if it seems to be that way.

it's a tautological fact - by definition - that the vast majority of people are roughly at or below average intelligence.

only a small number of people are above average intelligence. 

by definition.
“There’s good evidence from Spain, France and Austria that show that once it circulates in large numbers in 20-year-olds, it quickly emerges into the community in general. It then percolates up into the older age groups, and that’s where we know this disease has significant, dramatic impacts on mortality, hospitalization and very serious illness,” he said.

fine.

“We’re asking our young people to recognize the effect that can have. Even though they can feel that they’re invulnerable, the community is vulnerable.”

but, it's just clearly the wrong approach.

we can be quixotic about this - and fail.

or, we can be smart about it, and realize that the way to stop the virus from percolating upwards is to shield the elderly, and not to restrain the young.

while we should be empathetic and responsible as best we can, we cannot live our lives for the benefit of the elderly, who have already lived, and are nearing the ends of their lives. a free society must be built upon the prospects of the young, and not around the memories of the elders.

i'm sorry if you disagree, but you're wrong.

and you will lose - you will fail - unless you are more intelligent in your approach.

and, i can only appeal to the future, and ask them for hindsight.

but, you'll probably just call me an idiot - and have no concept of the irony, when you do.

Saturday, September 19, 2020

when somebody like chuck schumer, or bernie sanders as it may be, stands up and says "if you have the audacity to govern, we're going to stack the court when we finally win", the message that sends to me, as a voter, is "i don't care about democracy, and i'm willing to undo and subvert it in order to get what i want".

i'm more afraid of somebody promising to stack the court than i am of a judge i don't like; you can get rid of bad judges, but if you break the process, it's gone. kaput.

the democrats need to stop showing such contempt for voters...
a big part of the reason that the democrats lose so frequently, despite often commanding popular opinion, is that the ideas they come up with are consistently borderline retarded.

"but, fdr did it."

yeah, he did it to pass his legislation, not due to crying over spilled milk due to having lost the fucking election.

again: earth to democrats - if you want to govern, you have to win, first.
likewise, talk of packing the supreme court is supremely irresponsible and should be rejected in the most extreme terms possible. what do you think the republicans will do the next time they win? if it becomes normal to reshape the supreme court every time a new president is elected, that is essentially rendering the court meaningless. there is a separation of powers for a reason, and the court needs to hold the executive accountable, not become it's play thing, or be forced to conform to the executive's will.

these people are what is called sore losers.

if there are specific issues that congress believes are worth legislating to overturn court decisions it does not like then it should.

but, stacking the court is the dumbest idea possible, and anybody proposing it should be thrown out of the room.
what do i think, honestly?

i think that trump is still the president, and he needs to do his job, whatever that means. no president should punt anything to the next one - the job is to address the issues at hand, not set things up for the next administration.

for better or worse, voters elected trump to make this choice, and i actually think he has a responsibility to those voters to make it.

now, he could choose to punt it. but, that only makes sense in the context of him freely choosing it, not in the context evoked by biden, or relative to goofy ideas about mandates ending. 

the president is the president until january, at least, and he needs to do his job, in all it's functions.

now, if congress flips over in january, he could find his pick loses. and, the house democrats likewise have the ability to obfuscate, if they choose.

but, we shouldn't be talking about the executive evading or abandoning it's responsibilities. it was elected to govern, and it must, whether i like the outcome, or not.
joe biden has a very, very long history of just telling you whatever you want to hear, and making arguments up on the fly to advance his self-interest.

....kind of exactly like donald trump.

you need to understand that, and the developing fiasco around his flip-flopping over the biden rule needs to present itself as an example of how seriously to take him when he talks about things like spending money on climate change.
mcconnell is a hypocrite, too, but that's not surprising.

and he's not the author of the rule.
1992 - biden formulates the biden rule
2016 - biden rejects the biden rule
2020 - biden re-embraces the biden rule

as we can see, this is about political expediency, and not about principles or rules, at all.
it's actually going to be interesting how he tries to talk his way out of this, this time.

the biden rule essentially seems to be, in truth, that joe biden tends to make shit up as he goes.

 she'd probably conclude it's a better job, and take it.
i can't vote down there...

but, as a voter, i'd like to see the list - to quantify how bad this is really going to be, if he wins.
 trump should appoint kamala harris and see what happens.
if there's some pushback on the fake left about him releasing names, please realize that it's because they're afraid the list will scare people off.

i would consider it exceedingly unlikely that biden will choose anything resembling a liberal. so, do you want to sort through the list of conservative judges he's going to come up with? 

how would that make you feel about voting for him?

it's better if you don't know - and foolishly imagine congress can sway him.

i actually don't think it matters. they're both going to pick somebody terrible, and the degree of terribleness is so acute at this point, that it's hard to see potential meaningful differences.

i remember when this came up with hillary, and everybody refused to acknowledge that she supported a constitutional ban on specific types of abortions.
biden doesn't need a list - we know he's going to choose merrick garland.

don't forget to vote for him, kids.
i walked by a woman working at the grocery store today that almost ripped her mask off and walked out when she saw me.

jealous is an understatement. 

i overheard her say "and, i have to wear this fucking mask. it's not fair."

but, she'll shut up and do it, because she has bills to pay.

don't mistake compliance for consensus. there's clearly a lot of anger just under the surface. and, this new restriction on gatherings may be a tipping point.

or, not. it's hard to say.

the left needs some leadership willing to fight back against these conservative policies being pushed down by the state, and it's not going to be me. i can be subversive, i can lead by example, but i can't organize.

if somebody can, and does, they may find themselves with a very large audience, very fast.
i guess it wouldn't apply to schools, either.

this is a stupid policy designed to appeal to frightened, nanny state conservatives that can't follow the science. it's red meat for his base. and, it's all it is.

it won't work, either.

and, then they'll double down on it.

so, the virus took the 407.

schmancy pants virus, it seems.

impatient, no doubt, too.

so, what can i add with a small red pepper?

46% a ----> 116%
158% c
6% e ------>51%
substantive b6 & b9

a medium sized red pepper has 75% a, 10% e, 15% b6 & 15% b9.

the red pepper dominates the tomato. hrmmn. i wish i had done this before i went yesterday. it's also lower in fat, but more expensive.

it doesn't seem like it makes sense to buy tomatoes. and, perhaps the salad could even be worked into the pasta instead of the eggs, leaving me more room for bread with the eggs. they call that pasta salad.

disclaimer:
i've gone to town with a few things - i'm not making up vitamins but rather filling things in. i mean, there's all these "missing vitamin names". what were they, exactly? it also gives me an excuse to work in a few things like choline that are hard to otherwise define as they are essential in some amount but not technically vitamins.

note that these numbers are scavenged and should be interpreted approximately. that's partly why i'm aiming to overshoot on most of it.

banana
2*8"
strawberries
75 g
kiwi
2*75 g
soy milk
250 ml
cherry
ice cream
200 ml
red pepper
1
tomato
1
caesar
200 ml
eggs
2
cheese
50 g
margarine
1 tbsp
durum wheat
pasta
75 g
sum
a2*2=402*1=21013-15-21-50-
b1
thiamine
2*3=622*1=285-2-6--63-
b2 [aka g, j]
riboflavin
2*6=1212*1=22510-1-42--31-
b3
niacin
2*5=1022*1=2101-3-1--59-
b4*
adenine (mg)
2*1.63=3.260.3752*0.3=0.619.30--------
b5
pantothenic acid
2*5=1022*1=2155-1-21--?-
b6
pyridoxine
2*25=5022*2=461-4-12--?-
b7 [aka h]
biotin
2*10=202.5?301-10-65--?-
b8*
inositol (mg)

(myo or lipid)
2*10=20102*102=204255--------
b9 [aka m, b11, r]
folic acid
2*7=144.52*6=1261-3-18--53-
b10*
pABA
~0~0~0>0~0--------
b12 [aka t]
cyanocobalamin
0005020-0-33--?-
b13*
orotic acid (mg)
~0~0~0~020--------
b14*
taurine (mg)
~0~0~0~02--------
b15*
pangamic acid
~0~0~00?~0--------
b16*
choline
2*2=412*1=2115-1-68--?-
b20* [aka I]
l-carnitine
~0~0~0~05--------
c2*20=40742*117=23440-19-0--0-
d000450-0-12-150-
e2*1=21.52*10=2002-2-9-100-
f1*
linoleic acid
omega-6 (g)
2*.0626=0.1252.092*.187=0.3741.5.300-.073-.228--?-
f2*
alphalinoleic acid
omega-3 (g)
2*.0367=.0734.0652*.0319=.06380.2.200-.003-3.23--?-
k2*1=212*38=7850-9-9--?-
q1*
coenzyme q10 (mg)
2*.136=.272.0752*.0375=.075.625.0308---
----
q2*
pyrroloquinoline

 quinone (mu-g)
2*1.768=3.536?2*2.025=4.05.063.2101--------
q3*
queuine 
(mu-g)
?????--------
s*
salicylic acid (mg)
~0~12*~0.375=~.075~0~0--------

* not really.

- so nice vanilla soy milk
- chapman's black cherry ice cream
- select brand pasta [metro/food basics]

fruit bowl, so far:

a - 26---->27---->29%
b1 - 18% ----->21%
b2- 43% ------->49%
b3 - 19%---->18---->23%
b5 - 28%----->27%----->32%
b6 - 36%------>61%
b7 - 43.5%----->41% ---->51% (+ 2x unknown kiwi amount)
b9 - 24.5%----->26------>33%
b12 - 70% (still)
choline - 20% ---->22%
c - 215%  ----> 258 ----->278%
d - 45%  (still)
e - 14.5% ----> 23---->24%
omega-6: 2.1396 g ----> 2.2366 g -------> 2.2992 g
omega-3: 0.5336  g -----> 0.5005 --------> 0.5372 g
ratio: 4:1 ---->4.5:1 ------> 4.3:1 <----- a bit better, even
k - 45% ----> 84------>85%

eggs & pasta, so far:

a -  21----->26%
b1 - 6---->69%
b2- 42--->73%
b3 - 1--->60%
b5 - 21%
b6 - 12% 
b7 - 65%
b9 - 18--->71%
b12 - 33% 
choline - 68% 
c - 0%
d - 12----->27%  
e - 9---->19%
omega-6: 3.23 g + pasta
omega-3: 0.228 g + pasta
ratio: 14:1 <------- + pasta is going to be worse. it's unavoidable with non-fish meats, and less bad than mercury. i need to balance it...
k - 9

salad bowl, so far:

a - 15%
b1 - 2
b2 - 1
b3 - 3
b5 - 1
b6 - 4
b7 - 10
b9 - 3
b12 - 0
choline - 1
c - 19
d - 0
e - 2
omega-6: 0.073 g
omega-3: 0.003 g
ratio: 24:1 <------but, 70 mg, total
k - 9

total, so far:

a - 29 + 26 + 15 = 70%
b1 - 21 + 69 + 2 = 82%
b2- 49 + 73 + 1 = 123% 
b3 - 23 + 60 + 3 = 86%
b5 - 32 + 21 + 1 = 54%  + pasta
b6 - 61 + 12 + 4 = 77%  + pasta

b7 - 51 + 65 + 10 = 126% + pasta
b9 - 33 + 71 + 3 = 107%
b12 - 70 + 33 + 0 = 103% + pasta
choline - 22 + 68 + 1 = 91% + pasta
c - 278 + 0 + 19 = 298%
d - 45 + 27 + 0 = 72%
e - 24 + 19 + 2 = 45%

omega-6: 2.2992 + 3.23 + .073 =  5.6022 g + pasta
omega-3: 0.5372 + 0.228 + .003 = .7682 g + pasta
ratio: 7.29:1 <------- not including pasta. i need to balance this with some kind of seeds. 
k - 85 + 9 + 9 = 103% + pasta
if i'm moving to fetuccine & eggs, i'm not sure what i'll do with the cheese, yet. melting it on the pasta may be too heavy; i may prefer a lighter calorie content with the pasta (and i'm no longer in need of boosting fat content like i was, due to the higher proportion of eggs). i may eat it more like a macaroni salad, and get some fortified a & e out of it; i may experiment a little. i will find something to do with it.

i still don't know if i need salami or not. i seem to be in the yellow with the b12. how's the iron?

i should drink some apple juice with that meal to get some c for absorption. that's another 200%, in a tall glass.

but, i bought some tomatoes yesterday, so let's throw those in as i make some choices about red peppers. 2-2.5" is right for the ones i bought (intentionally; i couldn't find small peppers), so i'm going to use that data from the usda for now.

this gets me some a, a little more c and puts the k into the yellow.

disclaimer:
i've gone to town with a few things - i'm not making up vitamins but rather filling things in. i mean, there's all these "missing vitamin names". what were they, exactly? it also gives me an excuse to work in a few things like choline that are hard to otherwise define as they are essential in some amount but not technically vitamins.

note that these numbers are scavenged and should be interpreted approximately. that's partly why i'm aiming to overshoot on most of it.

banana
2*8"
strawberries
75 g
kiwi
2*75 g
soy milk
250 ml
cherry
ice cream
200 ml
red pepper
1
tomato
1
caesar
200 ml
eggs
2
cheese
50 g
margarine
1 tbsp
durum wheat
pasta
75 g
sum
a2*2=402*1=21013-15-21-50-
b1
thiamine
2*3=622*1=285-2-6--63-
b2 [aka g, j]
riboflavin
2*6=1212*1=22510-1-42--31-
b3
niacin
2*5=1022*1=2101-3-1--59-
b4*
adenine (mg)
2*1.63=3.260.3752*0.3=0.619.30--------
b5
pantothenic acid
2*5=1022*1=2155-1-21--?-
b6
pyridoxine
2*25=5022*2=461-4-12--?-
b7 [aka h]
biotin
2*10=202.5?301-10-65--?-
b8*
inositol (mg)

(myo or lipid)
2*10=20102*102=204255--------
b9 [aka m, b11, r]
folic acid
2*7=144.52*6=1261-3-18--53-
b10*
pABA
~0~0~0>0~0--------
b12 [aka t]
cyanocobalamin
0005020-0-33--?-
b13*
orotic acid (mg)
~0~0~0~020--------
b14*
taurine (mg)
~0~0~0~02--------
b15*
pangamic acid
~0~0~00?~0--------
b16*
choline
2*2=412*1=2115-1-68--?-
b20* [aka I]
l-carnitine
~0~0~0~05--------
c2*20=40742*117=23440-19-0--0-
d000450-0-12-150-
e2*1=21.52*10=2002-2-9-100-
f1*
linoleic acid
omega-6 (g)
2*.0626=0.1252.092*.187=0.3741.5.300-.073-.228--?-
f2*
alphalinoleic acid
omega-3 (g)
2*.0367=.0734.0652*.0319=.06380.2.200-.003-3.23--?-
k2*1=212*38=7850-9-9--?-
q1*
coenzyme q10 (mg)
2*.136=.272.0752*.0375=.075.625.0308---
----
q2*
pyrroloquinoline

 quinone (mu-g)
2*1.768=3.536?2*2.025=4.05.063.2101--------
q3*
queuine 
(mu-g)
?????--------
s*
salicylic acid (mg)
~0~12*~0.375=~.075~0~0--------

* not really.

- so nice vanilla soy milk
- chapman's black cherry ice cream
- select brand pasta [metro/food basics]

fruit bowl, so far:

a - 26---->27---->29%
b1 - 18% ----->21%
b2- 43% ------->49%
b3 - 19%---->18---->23%
b5 - 28%----->27%----->32%
b6 - 36%------>61%
b7 - 43.5%----->41% ---->51% (+ 2x unknown kiwi amount)
b9 - 24.5%----->26------>33%
b12 - 70% (still)
choline - 20% ---->22%
c - 215%  ----> 258 ----->278%
d - 45%  (still)
e - 14.5% ----> 23---->24%
omega-6: 2.1396 g ----> 2.2366 g -------> 2.2992 g
omega-3: 0.5336  g -----> 0.5005 --------> 0.5372 g
ratio: 4:1 ---->4.5:1 ------> 4.3:1 <----- a bit better, even
k - 45% ----> 84------>85%

eggs & pasta, so far:

a -  21----->26%
b1 - 6---->69%
b2- 42--->73%
b3 - 1--->60%
b5 - 21%
b6 - 12% 
b7 - 65%
b9 - 18--->71%
b12 - 33% 
choline - 68% 
c - 0%
d - 12----->27%  
e - 9---->19%
omega-6: 3.23 g + pasta
omega-3: 0.228 g + pasta
ratio: 14:1 <------- + pasta is going to be worse. it's unavoidable with non-fish meats, and less bad than mercury. i need to balance it...
k - 9

salad bowl, so far:

a - 15%
b1 - 2
b2 - 1
b3 - 3
b5 - 1
b6 - 4
b7 - 10
b9 - 3
b12 - 0
choline - 1
c - 19
d - 0
e - 2
omega-6: 0.073 g
omega-3: 0.003 g
ratio: 24:1 <------but, 70 mg, total
k - 9

total, so far:

a - 29 + 26 + 15 = 70%
b1 - 21 + 69 + 2 = 82%
b2- 49 + 73 + 1 = 123% 
b3 - 23 + 60 + 3 = 86%
b5 - 32 + 21 + 1 = 54%  + pasta
b6 - 61 + 12 + 4 = 77%  + pasta

b7 - 51 + 65 + 10 = 126% + pasta
b9 - 33 + 71 + 3 = 107%
b12 - 70 + 33 + 0 = 103% + pasta
choline - 22 + 68 + 1 = 91% + pasta
c - 278 + 0 + 19 = 298%
d - 45 + 27 + 0 = 72%
e - 24 + 19 + 2 = 45%

omega-6: 2.2992 + 3.23 + .073 =  5.6022 g + pasta
omega-3: 0.5372 + 0.228 + .003 = .7682 g + pasta
ratio: 7.29:1 <------- not including pasta. i need to balance this with some kind of seeds. 
k - 85 + 9 + 9 = 103% + pasta
and, what about the margarine?

it has a, d & e and i use a tablespoon to fry the eggs with. these are all heat-stable vitamins.

recently, i've also been putting a tablespoon on my toast, and i'm wondering if i can make a little bit of room on the plate to keep doing it. i just bought a loaf yesterday, so i have some to use up still. it's just a good way to get these rare vitamins - which is no doubt why it's fortified with them. that's some extra b, too - it could get me into the yellow zone across the board, in the end.

but, i'm just going to put in those key vitamins for the frying oil, for now and see what happens, after. i can get a & e from vegetables, d less so.

disclaimer:
i've gone to town with a few things - i'm not making up vitamins but rather filling things in. i mean, there's all these "missing vitamin names". what were they, exactly? it also gives me an excuse to work in a few things like choline that are hard to otherwise define as they are essential in some amount but not technically vitamins.

note that these numbers are scavenged and should be interpreted approximately. that's partly why i'm aiming to overshoot on most of it.

banana
2*8"
strawberries
75 g
kiwi
2*75 g
soy milk
250 ml
cherry
ice cream
200 ml
red pepper
1
tomato
1
caesar
200 ml
eggs
2
cheese
50 g
margarine
1 tbsp
durum wheat
pasta
75 g
sum
a2*2=402*1=21013---21-50-
b1
thiamine
2*3=622*1=285---6--63-
b2 [aka g, j]
riboflavin
2*6=1212*1=22510---42--31-
b3
niacin
2*5=1022*1=2101---1--59-
b4*
adenine (mg)
2*1.63=3.260.3752*0.3=0.619.30--------
b5
pantothenic acid
2*5=1022*1=2155---21--?-
b6
pyridoxine
2*25=5022*2=461---12--?-
b7 [aka h]
biotin
2*10=202.5?301---65--?-
b8*
inositol (mg)

(myo or lipid)
2*10=20102*102=204255--------
b9 [aka m, b11, r]
folic acid
2*7=144.52*6=1261---18--53-
b10*
pABA
~0~0~0>0~0--------
b12 [aka t]
cyanocobalamin
0005020---33--?-
b13*
orotic acid (mg)
~0~0~0~020--------
b14*
taurine (mg)
~0~0~0~02--------
b15*
pangamic acid
~0~0~00?~0--------
b16*
choline
2*2=412*1=2115---68--?-
b20* [aka I]
l-carnitine
~0~0~0~05--------
c2*20=40742*117=23440---0--0-
d000450---12-150-
e2*1=21.52*10=2002---9-100-
f1*
linoleic acid
omega-6 (g)
2*.0626=0.1252.092*.187=0.3741.5.300---.228--?-
f2*
alphalinoleic acid
omega-3 (g)
2*.0367=.0734.0652*.0319=.06380.2.200---3.23--?-
k2*1=212*38=7850---9--?-
q1*
coenzyme q10 (mg)
2*.136=.272.0752*.0375=.075.625.0308---
----
q2*
pyrroloquinoline

 quinone (mu-g)
2*1.768=3.536?2*2.025=4.05.063.2101--------
q3*
queuine 
(mu-g)
?????--------
s*
salicylic acid (mg)
~0~12*~0.375=~.075~0~0--------

* not really.

- so nice vanilla soy milk
- chapman's black cherry ice cream
- select brand pasta [metro/food basics]

fruit bowl, so far:

a - 26---->27---->29%
b1 - 18% ----->21%
b2- 43% ------->49%
b3 - 19%---->18---->23%
b5 - 28%----->27%----->32%
b6 - 36%------>61%
b7 - 43.5%----->41% ---->51% (+ 2x unknown kiwi amount)
b9 - 24.5%----->26------>33%
b12 - 70% (still)
choline - 20% ---->22%
c - 215%  ----> 258 ----->278%
d - 45%  (still)
e - 14.5% ----> 23---->24%
omega-6: 2.1396 g ----> 2.2366 g -------> 2.2992 g
omega-3: 0.5336  g -----> 0.5005 --------> 0.5372 g
ratio: 4:1 ---->4.5:1 ------> 4.3:1 <----- a bit better, even
k - 45% ----> 84------>85%

eggs & pasta, so far:

a -  21----->26%
b1 - 6---->69%
b2- 42--->73%
b3 - 1--->60%
b5 - 21%
b6 - 12% 
b7 - 65%
b9 - 18--->71%
b12 - 33% 
choline - 68% 
c - 0%
d - 12----->27%  
e - 9---->19%
omega-6: 3.23 g + pasta
omega-3: 0.228 g + pasta
ratio: 14:1 <------- + pasta is going to be worse. it's unavoidable with non-fish meats, and less bad than mercury. i need to balance it...
k - 9

total, so far:

a - 29 + 26 = 55%
b1 - 21 + 69 = 80%
b2- 49 + 73 = 122% 
b3 - 23 + 60 = 83%
b5 - 32 + 21 = 53%  + pasta
b6 - 61 + 12 = 73%  + pasta

b7 - 51 + 65 = 116% + pasta
b9 - 33 + 71 = 104%
b12 - 70 + 33 = 103%
choline - 22 + 68 = 90%
c - 278 + 0 = 278%
d - 45 + 27 = 72%
e - 24 + 19 = 43%

omega-6: 2.2992 + 3.23 =  5.5292 g + pasta
omega-3: 0.5372 + 0.228 = .7652 g + pasta
ratio: 7.25:1 <------- not including pasta. i need to balance this with some kind of seeds. 
k - 85 + 9 = 94%