stop.

you have to understand that the roman church did exactly the same thing to germans, slavs and celts in northern europe from c. 500-c.1500 as it did to indigenous peoples in the americas from c. 1500-c.1900. if anything, the colonization of native americans was less brutal and less complete than the colonization of northern europe. but, there was a continuity - the colonization of the americas was the next step in the process, the logical continuation of colonizing europe.

there's a common enemy here in christianity. but, the natives need to drop their own xenophobia in order to get their heads around it.

the church carried out massacres against the natives, no doubt. but, there was nothing as horrific as the genocide that charlemagne carried out against the saxons, there was never anything like the crusade against the albigensians, there was nothing as systematic as the inquisition, etc.

and, this is my piss off against this modern foucaudian concept of history: it is ridiculously ignorant, in it's total lack of knowledge of europe. it knows nothing of the history of this continent, and yet somehow claims to right a set of wrongs carried out by this continent, from this position of abject ignorance about it.

is there an african or indigenous tribe that has been so violently separated from it's past that it can't even reconstruct it? for, that is the truth of indigenous european religion: it is so utterly erased that we only have scattered fragments remaining of what it even was.

and, then they blame these crimes on white europeans, who are the most colonized people on the planet.

your enemy is messianic religion, and it is a common enemy that we both share. let's understand that.